|
|
 |
American
Collection
Severin Roesen (1815-1872) German born American Painter
 |
Still
Life
Severin Roesen (German, ca.1815-ca. 1872), Active United States
Oil on canvas
25 x 35in. (63.5x88.9 cms)
Signed l.r.:S Roesen, not dated
Gift of Mrs. Sterling Morton for the Preston Morton Collection
1960.79 |
The
painting was lined at an unknown date and its general condition is secure.
The canvas is covered with a thin white ground, which does not obscure
the texture. The paint is applied smoothly except for some fine impasto
and scrumbling over darker colors.
The early history is unknown, but a letter from the librarian at M. Knoedler
and Company states that it was purchased from Mrs. Paul Magriel in May
1955 and notes that Paul Magriel got it from someone else who got it at
a country auction in Connecticut. It was sold to Mrs. Sterling Morton
in 1960.
THE ARTIST
Severin Roesen, the most prolific still-life artist in America in the
mid-nineteenth century, has no certain place or date of birth recorded.
It is thought he was born in 1815 in or near Cologne, and that he was
a porcelain and enamel painter who exhibited a flower painting at a Cologne
art club in 1847. Possibly he studied at the nearby Dusseldorf Art Academy.
As a flower painter, he must have known the work of Dusseldorf's leading
still-life artist, Johann Wilhelm Preyer (1799-1889). Preyer has visited
Holland in 1835 to study the still-lifes of the late seventeenth and early
eighteenth century Dutch Masters, Jan van Huysum and Rachel Ruysch. His
canvases were later shown at the Dusseldorf galleries in New York in 1851.
Roesen and his future wife, Wilhelmina Ludwig, were immigrants who came
to America in 1845 to escape political upheavals in Germany. Their first
of three children, a daughter was born in 1851. They settled in New York
where Roesen exhibited his still-lifes with the American Art-Union in
1848, and 1850. One of his paintings was sold in 1852.
In 1857, Roesen probably left his family in New York and went to Philadelphia.
The financial panic of 1857, as well as the introduction of important
new styles of painting from France and England's Pre-Raphaelite Show in
New York that same year, materially affected the sale of his work. From
Philadelphia, Roesen went to Harrisburg where he sold two large paintings
in 1859. The next year, he traveled to Huntington, and by 1862, he had
settled in the wealthy community of Williamsport, where his work continued
to be popular, and where he remained active for the next ten years. In
1872, he probably left Williamsport to rejoin his family in New York where
his first grandchild had been born. His last dated painting was finished
in 1872, after which he drops from view, and we have no date or place
of his death.
When Roesen arrived in New York, he brought in his art, influences of
the lush 17th century Dutch and floral painting with its meticulous attention
to detail interpreted in clear, sharp light and intense colors of the
Dusseldorf school. His work contrasted markedly with that of the earlier
American still-life painters. In comparison with Roesen's strikingly colored,
elaborate floral compositions and luscious fruit displays, the early 19th
century American style appeared spare and austere.
His work also contrasted in subject matter. Earlier American still-life
artists had concerned themselves predominately with fruit compositions.
Flowers, when painted, were generally shown from a botanical point of
view, or as adjuncts to portraiture.
The chronology of Roesen's work is vague; many of his paintings are not
signed or dated. Acknowledged works are thought to be the ones of which
the artist was most proud. In most of his paintings he used similar groupings
of fruit and flowers with only slight variations in content or assembly,
giving rise to the view that he kept templates of arrangements he found
particularly successful.Roesen's art made the 17th century Dutch tradition
and the clear intense color of the Dusseldorf school available in this
country at a time when American flowers and fruit paintings were quite
small and still-life was considered a lesser art when compared to portraiture,
landscape and historical painting. His style, as well as his gigantic
paintings gave considerable impetus to the popularity of the still-life
genre in this country.
THE PAINTING
In his flower paintings, Roesen almost invariably included two different
species of old or antique roses, both of which were represented in paintings
of earlier European masters. In the SBMA painting, these two roses are
nestled in the center of the flower group as they are in so many of the
Dutch still-lifes. The snake-like tendrils at the top of the composition
are another European motif favored by Roesen. He used the tendrils to
form his most characteristic signature.
The horizontal composition is a loose triangle of fruits and flowers resting
on a white marble ledge which, extends off the canvas to the right. The
painting is divided vertically. Each half, fruit on the right and flowers
on the left, is a triangle in itself and could stand alone. At the lower
left center, a bunch of green grapes on their stem and a pink rose meet
and overhang the marble ledge, drawing attention to the asymmetric center
of the composition. From there, the green grapes and stem, a pear and
several grape leaves form a strong diagonal of analogous greens rising
from left to right. At the top, a white tip on the grape stem against
the yellow-brown background marks the apex of the fruit triangle. The
blue red plums backed by a bunch of purple grapes form its right-hand
corner. To the left, the red, orange and yellow of a peach brings the
eye back to the central green pear, completing the color wheel sequence.
The floral half is a vertical triangle, which has as its apex the calla
lily, starkly white against the dark red-brown background. The blues,
reds and white of the flower contrast strongly with the predominately
yellow-greens in the fruit triangle. Broken flower stems and the fallen
rose speak of the brief life and fragility of flower, emphasizing the
ripe firm weight of the fruit.
CONCLUSION
Severin Roesen arrived in this country as a young man but a mature artist.
The quality of his work varied, but his best work was consistently of
high caliber. Although his painting number in the hundreds, his style
changed very little. He was not influenced by the Pre-Raphaelite fidelity
to nature or Ruskin's appeal for humble naturalness. Roesen, the man became
an American citizen, but in his art he remained German.
Prepared for the SBMA Docent Council by Kay Wall, March 1988.
|